Abstract

The flux-rope theory of solar magnetic fields is reviewed briefly and, together with the dynamo theory, compared with various observational results. Dynamo and related theories are based on fields controlled by the plasma, and it is shown that such fields cannot account for the strong surface fields or even emerge without becoming tangled. Observations which appear uniquely explicable in terms of powerful (⪝4000 G), helically twisted flux ropes and their many twisted flux fibres (≈3×1018 Mx) are listed as follows. (i) Emerging magnetic flux is seen first as pairs of small, closely spaced flux concentrations whose motions suggest magnetic control to provide bipolar regions of extent⪞105 km. The associated system of arch filaments rotates on the disk as would a series of emerging flux fibres twisted into a rope. (ii) Sunspots form by the accretion of pores and magnetic knots of like polarity, sometimes moving along curved paths between stationary elements of opposite polarity. (iii) Fluxes of⪞1022 Mx in large sunspots must have been concentrated to strengths of⪞4000 G before emerging, and also strongly helically twisted to avoid the flute instability. (iv) The trumpet-shaped flux-rope-fibre sunspot model (Figure 6) accounts readily for the phenomena of the moat convection, the sunspot energy deficit, the complex Evershed flow, penumbral filaments (flux ≈3×1018 Mx) and temporary light bridges. (v) Asymmetries in sunspot groups (in spot size, lifetime and proper motion) show that the spot fields are extensions of two submerged magnetic structures comprising strong fields. (vi) Sunspots decay by the loss of magnetic knots with strong fields and flux ≈5×1018 Mx. These must be isolated flux tubes, twisted to account for their stability. (vii) Flux fibres leaving a spot are prone to the kink instability, thus accounting for their sudden appearance in pairs, the transport of total flux several times that of the spot and net flux equal to that of the spot. (viii) Ephemeral active regions and X-ray bright points are explained similarly without invoking improbably huge quantities of new flux. (ix) Atmospheric structures show a high prevalence of helical twists (force-free fields) and rotary motions on all scales from spicules to large prominences. It is difficult to account for these twists unless they are present in emerging flux. (x) In and above the photosphere the flux fibres (≈3×1018 Mx) fray into loose associations of flux threads (≈3×1017 Mx) to provide a simple, selfconsistent model of the solar filigree and the chromospheric rosette (bush) with its group of mottles (spicules). (xi) Global patterns of surface and coronal magnetic fields reveal puzzling features such as the migration of large unipolar regions and the freedom from differential rotation of some structures. Submerged flux ropes ‘peeling’ out of the Sun provide a starting point for explaining these effects. These results provide a strong case for the flux-rope theory against the entrenched dynamo theory, and suggest that more observations should be made of the above ten phenomena. Where possible, simultaneous observations should be made of Zeeman effects and of plasma distributions and velocity field seen in white light and spectral lines.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call