Abstract

This paper analyzes the recent reform regarding the legal capacity of persons with disabilities in Peru. It provides a domestic legal and judicial context in which the reform was adopted. Following this, the paper aims to analyze the reform’s conformity with article 12 of the Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, noting that the current regulation is only partially CRPD compliant. The current design of judicially designated supporters can be understood as valid under specific interpretations of Article 12, while the design of safeguards does not comply with such standard. The paper addresses the impact of legal capacity reform in traditional private law theory of the juridical act. Currently, the Peruvian system does not provide clear or accurate standards to respond to this problem. The paper shines a light on the need to rethink multiple concepts of private law in order to make legal capacity reform fully operational.

Highlights

  • This paper analyzes the recent reform regarding the legal capacity of persons with disabilities in Peru

  • I will assess the impact the Reform has had on the concept of free will and how this affects the basic tenets of Private Law

  • Private Law has to change to adapt to the recognition of legal capacity of persons with disabilities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Implementation of Article 12 of the Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is one of the most critical issues in disability rights nowadays. Article 12 CRPD is entitled “Equal recognition before the law” and it has 5 sections: legal personhood (passive capacity), legal capacity (capacity to act), supports, safeguards and access to property and financial services. This means that States “shall recognize that persons with disabilities enjoy legal capacity on an equal basis with others in all aspects of life” (Article 12.2). “States must holistically examine all areas of law to ensure that the right of persons with disabilities to legal capacity is not restricted on an unequal basis with others” This debate, as well as others, will inform my analysis throughout the paper

A brief reference to the legal context in Peru
Legislative developments
The Committee members were
Judicial developments
Legal capacity in the Reform
Support in the Reform
The exceptional case of judicially designated supporters
32 See also
Safeguards in the Reform
The Reform in current Private Law Theory
The Juridical Act in Private Law
Conflict of interest
Undue influence
Preliminary conclusions
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call