Abstract

Abstract. The first aerosol indirect effect (1AIE) is investigated using a combination of in situ and remotely-sensed aircraft (NCAR C-130) observations acquired during VOCALS-REx over the southeast Pacific stratocumulus cloud regime. Satellite analyses have previously identified a high albedo susceptibitility to changes in cloud microphysics and aerosols over this region. The 1AIE was broken down into the product of two independently-estimated terms: the cloud aerosol interaction metric ACIτ =dlnτ/dlnNa|LWP , and the relative albedo (A) susceptibility SR-τ =dA/3dlnτ|LWP, with τ and Na denoting retrieved cloud optical thickness and in situ aerosol concentration respectively and calculated for fixed intervals of liquid water path (LWP). ACIτ was estimated by combining in situ Na sampled below the cloud, with τ and LWP derived from, respectively, simultaneous upward-looking broadband irradiance and narrow field-of-view millimeter-wave radiometer measurements, collected at 1 Hz during four eight-hour daytime flights by the C-130 aircraft. ACIτ values were typically large, close to the physical upper limit (0.33), with a modest increase with LWP. The high ACIτ values slightly exceed values reported from many previous in situ airborne studies in pristine marine stratocumulus and reflect the imposition of a LWP constraint and simultaneity of aerosol and cloud measurements. SR-τ increased with LWP and τ, reached a maximum SR-τ (0.086) for LWP (τ) of 58 g m−2 (~14), and decreased slightly thereafter. The 1AIE thus increased with LWP and is comparable to a radiative forcing of −3.2– −3.8 W m−2 for a 10% increase in Na, exceeding previously-reported global-range values. The aircraft-derived values are consistent with satellite estimates derived from instantaneous, collocated Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) albedo and MOderate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-retrieved droplet number concentrations at 50 km resolution. The consistency of the airborne and satellite estimates, despite their independent approaches, differences in observational scales, and retrieval assumptions, is hypothesized to reflect the ideal remote sensing conditions for these homogeneous clouds. We recommend the southeast Pacific for regional model assessments of the first aerosol indirect effect on this basis. This airborne remotely-sensed approach towards quantifying 1AIE should in theory be more robust than in situ calculations because of increased sampling. However, although the technique does not explicitly depend on a remotely-derived cloud droplet number concentration (Nd), the at-times unrealistically-high Nd values suggest more emphasis on accurate airborne radiometric measurements is needed to refine this approach.

Highlights

  • The First Aerosol Indirect Effect (1AIE) is the cloud albedo enhancement that results from an increase in the cloud droplet number concentration and optical thickness due to increases in the aerosol burden with all other cloud properties, typically cloud liquid water path, held constant (Twomey, 1977)

  • We focused on cloud conditions most conplying the retrieval algorithm to the modified pyranometer ducive to first aerosol indirect effects: well-coupled, unbrofluxes, we found biases between 15 % ( τ =0.6) and 5 % ( τ = 2) for a range of τ between 4 and 40 respectively kp3el4ens cwloituhdslidwairt-hblaisttelde precipitation

  • A strength of this study was the imposition of liquid water path (LWP) constraints, the collocated aerosol-cloud property measurements, and the ability to sample within a consistent meteorological regime

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The First Aerosol Indirect Effect (1AIE) is the cloud albedo enhancement that results from an increase in the cloud droplet number concentration and optical thickness due to increases in the aerosol burden with all other cloud properties, typically cloud liquid water path, held constant (Twomey, 1977). In situ and land (surface)-based observations are deemed to be more accurate, but different studies report a wide range of estimates of ACI (see McComiskey and Feingold, 2008, for a review) This apparent inconsistency has been explained by dissimilar spatial/temporal resolution of the observations, biases inherent to the retrievals, lack of LWP constraint, and potential regime-dependent differences (McComiskey and Feingold, 2012). We explore these issues for this region, using airborne in situ and remotely-sensed observations, and by comparing the airborne-derived numbers to satellite estimates.

15 October 18 October 9 November 11 November
Dataset
Regional context
LWP-τ consistency and general overview
ACI calculations
Albedo susceptibility and susceptibilities
Findings
Summary and conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call