Abstract

The aim of study. The paper discusses the change of the silver proof of Riga schillings in the so-called Polish times. According to the Corpus privilegiorum Stepheneum (14 January 1581), Riga was confirmed minting rights, which however prescribed changes in coin design and fineness: on the one side coins had to bear the insignia of the Commonwealth and on the other side the coat of arms of the City; coins had to be of the same fineness and weight as the Polish and Lithuanian coinage so that there were no difference in their usage. Research methodology. Methods of analysis, classification, generalization and statistical methods were used to obtain the tasks set in the work. Riga schillings are arguably among the most widely studied and well-known coinages of the city mint of Riga, the capital of modern Latvia. In 1582 the first Polish style shilling was minted in Riga. Starting with 1588 shillings and 3-groschen coins (dreyer) were produced in the name of Sigismund III. Carrying almost all the same visual attributes as the coins of Stephan Bathory. From the late 16th century until the mid-17th century the production of this northernmost situated mint occupied a dominant role in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth market of small change. This has been suggested by the various archaeological data offered by Polish numismatists. Despite the fact that Riga schillings have been a subject of research over the last century, to this day scholars have not reached common understanding on the quality issue of the schillings. As is evident Baltic and Polish numismatists have disagreements about metrological terms of the early Commonwealth schillings. Scientific novelty. In an attempt to clear up some of the problems, three legislative sources will be paid special attention: ordinances of the Warsaw Sejm 1579/80 and the ordinances of the Monetary Commissions of Warsaw from 1604 and 1616. The Conclusions. This article argues that the Riga schillings were minted accordingly to the mint order, however from 1604 Riga (and Lithuanian) schillings deviated from the Polish schillings as they were minted of higher minting standard..

Highlights

  • Used to obtain the tasks set in the work

  • Despite the separation between Polish and Lithuanian schillings, which took place already in 1604, with minor differences we can agree with other debasement figures offered by Zagorski

  • Among others schillings of the Vilnius and Riga mints from 1616 were tested; both were being minted from 2 lot 3 pfennig silver and contained 220 pieces in 1 weight mark

Read more

Summary

Silver proof

V. (2019) The Mint book of Riga, 1598-1603, P.93 2 LVVA 673-1-1283, fol. 58 3 Gumowski, M. (1990) Mennica Gdańska. Despite the separation between Polish and Lithuanian schillings, which took place already in 1604, with minor differences we can agree with other debasement figures offered by Zagorski. Among others schillings of the Vilnius and Riga mints from 1616 were tested; both were being minted from 2 lot 3 pfennig silver and contained 220 pieces in 1 weight mark.. The main points of interest in the text are: the silver price which was increased to 46 groschen in thaler and the proposal to mint schillings from 2 lot 3 pfennig silver alloy and 213 pieces in weight mark. At the same time Riga schillings were minted from 2 lot 2 d and contained 250 pieces in weight mark. . To further exchange with groschen and double pfennigs Riga magistrate ordered to mint schillings with 260 pieces in a weight mark. Wulff paid his last rent for the period until 12 August, which saw the arrival of the Swedish fleet at the mouth of the Daugava river

Coins in weight mark
Findings
Polish groschen
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.