Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the relationship between the cerebro-placental ratio (CPR) and intrapartum and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by pre-existing insulin dependent diabetes (pT1DM) mellitus, pre-existing non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (pT2DM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Study designThis was a retrospective cohort study of 1281 women with diabetes mellitus birthing at the Mater Mothers’ Hospital in Brisbane between 2007 and 2015. The CPR in non-anomalous singleton fetuses was measured between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks gestation and compared between types of DM treatment groups and correlated with intrapartum and perinatal outcomes. ResultsOf the study cohort, 9.7% (124/1281) had pT1DM, 5.3% (68/1281) had pT2DM and 85.0% (1089/1281) had GDM. Of women with pT2DM and GDM, 61.8% (42/68) and 28.9% (315/1089) respectively, required insulin during pregnancy. Women with pT1DM had an increased odds of having a CPR <5th centile (OR 3.73, 95%CI: 1.90-6.96, p=0.0001) or a CPR <10th centile (OR 3.01, 95% CI: 1.80–4.91, p<0.0001) respectively. The odds of a UA PI >90th centile (OR 2.69, 95% CI: 1.60–4.39, p=0.0001) was higher in the pT1DM cohort. There was however no significant difference in the mean MCA PI between the three groups. Stratification by CPR centiles (<10th centile vs. ≥10th centile) demonstrated a lower birth weight in the CPR <10th centile cohort for all DM categories. The proportion of neonates with birth weights <10th centile were higher in the CPR <10th centile cohort with the GDM cohort having an odds ratio of 8.28 (95% CI 4.22–16.13, p<0.0001) of this complication. The CPR <10th centile cohort also had a greater proportion of adverse composite neonatal outcome regardless of type of DM. ConclusionsRegardless of the type of DM, a low CPR was associated with poorer neonatal outcomes. Women with pT1DM also had the highest mean UA PI and lowest mean CPR despite no difference in the mean MCA PI between the three groups.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.