Abstract

Scholarly debates over immigration and “diaspora” have shifted in recent years to pluralistic approaches of critics such as Bhabha and Hall who argue that the “hybridity” and “in-betweenness” of immigrants’ life might function as a suitable ground for the social and cultural improvement of their life-conditions. Drawing on such ideas, writers of the present article contend that Jhumpa Lahiri presents a double-sided outlook about the “third space” of diasporic life in her stories, while most critics have considered her attitude toward immigration a negative one. We argue that though Lahiri portrays immigrants’ problems in her stories, a meticulous appraisal of her work reveals the fact that she opposes too much insistence on traditional definitions of home and motherland, and instead pays tribute to the fluidity and flexibility of hybrid identity. She foregrounds the efficiency and fertility of the “third space” of diasporic life in several cases in her fiction by giving centrality and priority to those characters that are flexible, renounce the restricting customs of the left motherland, venture experiencing the inexperienced, and consequently can match themselves with their changed social position to achieve the best out of it.

Highlights

  • The new inquiries of such thinkers as Homi K

  • In spite of depicting the problems immigrants encounter in their diasporic life, Lahiri exposes that in some cases their attitude toward the new conditions of life might change after a while, and this change results in positive outcomes for them

  • Thanks to being born to immigrant parents besides the early change of her life place, she has experienced a “multicultural life style” (Lyer 2003, 156) which is reflected in her stories. She has travelled several times to Calcutta she describes as “a bustling unruly city, so different from the small New England town” where she was raised, and her recurrent going to Calcutta initiated her talent for fiction writing, as she has stated herself: “Calcutta nourished my mind, my eyes as a writer and my interest in seeing things from a different point of view”. The characters she portrays in her stories are either of the first or the second generations of Indian immigrants living in America

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The new inquiries of such thinkers as Homi K. One of the merits of Lahiri’s work is its openness to different interpretations; though the first impression created by her stories is a nostalgic feeling generated by exposing the sense of displacement and miscommunication among immigrants, optimistic perspectives are observed in them Considering her portrayal of hybridization and assimilation, we discuss that this diasporic writer gives credit to positive aspects of immigration due to which a sort of awakening happens in some of her characters, and in some cases their talents are flourished in an “unaccustomed earth”. Bhabha and Stuart Hall into the notion of homeland, diaspora and hybridity which counter the widely-held idea that immigrants experience “in-betweenness” and suffer from displacement

New Outlooks toward Diaspora
The Fertile “Third Space” Depicted in Lahiri’s Stories
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call