Abstract

The incorporation of fullerenes and carbon nanotubes into electronic, optical and consumer products will inevitably lead to the presence of these anthropogenic compounds in the environment. To date, there have been few studies isolating these materials from environmental matrices. Here we report a method commonly used to quantify black carbon (BC) in soils, the benzene polycarboxylic acid (BPCA) method, for measurement of two types of single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), two types of fullerenes and two forms of soot. The distribution of BC products (BPCAs) from the high pressure and high temperature oxidation illustrates the condensed nature of these compounds because they form predominantly fully substituted mellitic acid (B6CA). The conversion of carbon nanoparticles to BPCAs was highest for fullerenes (average of 23.2 ± 4.0% C recovered for both C 60 and C 70) and lowest for non-functionalized SWCNTs (0.5 ± 0.1% C). The recovery of SWCNTs was 10 times higher when processed through a cation-exchange column, indicating the presence of metals in SWCNTs compromises the oxidation chemistry. While mixtures of SWCNTs, soot and sediment revealed small losses of black carbon during sample processing, the method is suitable for quantifying total BC. The BPCA distribution of mixtures did not agree with theoretical mixtures using model polyaromatic hydrocarbons, suggesting the presence of a matrix effect. Future work is required to quantify different types of black carbon within the same sample.

Highlights

  • As the industrial application for carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and fullerene production increases, their presence in the environment is an eventuality

  • In this paper we present the distribution of benzene polycarboxylic acid (BPCA) and the percent carbon recovered for two fullerenes, two carbon nanotubes and two other carbon nanoparticles, hexane soot and carbon lampblack

  • We investigated the effect of oxidation duration on the single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) BPCA distribution

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As the industrial application for carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and fullerene production increases, their presence in the environment is an eventuality. While these compounds have much biomedical promise (Bianco et al, 2005), there is conflicting eco-toxic evidence (Oberdorster, 2004; Tong et al, 2007) about their impact on organisms in nature. The analytical methods used to isolate these materials from environmental matrices are limited, inhibiting our ability to directly quantify these compounds. Numerous techniques have been used to characterize fullerenes, such as mass spectrometry and UV–vis spectroscopy (Isaacson et al, 2007; Andrievsky et al, 2002), but few methods have successfully isolated fullerenes from environmental matrices.

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.