Abstract
In this article 4 complexes energy efficiency measures for different energy efficiency classes are chosen, it is defined the thermal heating costs of the building during the heating period, it is defined the cost and the payback period of energy efficiency measures. The conclusion about the feasibility of capital repair of buildings by increasing energy efficiency class from an economic point of view is made.
Highlights
In Russia at the present time the potential of energy savings is 35 % to 45 % of total modern energy consumption, which 350-460 million tons is conditional fuel
If we consider that the Russia total area of operated buildings is about 4.8 billion m2 and heating annually is 400 million tons of fuel equivalent, or 25% of the annual energy countries, it is quite obvious priority role of energy efficiency measures [4, 5]
Improving energy efficiency leads to energy savings, the cost to them
Summary
In Russia at the present time the potential of energy savings is 35 % to 45 % of total modern energy consumption, which 350-460 million tons is conditional fuel. If we consider that the Russia total area of operated buildings is about 4.8 billion m2 and heating annually is 400 million tons of fuel equivalent, or 25% of the annual energy countries, it is quite obvious priority role of energy efficiency measures [4, 5]. One of the possible ways of improving energy efficiency is a capital repair and modernization of existing buildings by improving energy efficiency measures [6, 7]. The purpose of this article is to analyze the feasibility of capital repair of buildings by improving energy efficiency class from an economic point of view
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
