Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the existence of familiarity bias amongst individual investors in the South African stock market. Problem investigated: According to Warren Buffet, one needs to maintain emotional detachment if one wants to be a successful investor. However, recent research indicates that the perceptions of companies’ products and brands may influence individuals’ investment decisions in the stock market. This phenomenon implies that the investment decisions of individual investors are not purely based on firm fundamentals as suggested by traditional finance theories, but might be driven partly by the positive or negative attitude they have towards certain companies’ products and brands. The existence of familiarity bias amongst individual investors was investigated to determine if individuals prefer to invest in companies they are familiar with as opposed to unfamiliar companies. Methodology: A quantitative approach was followed. An online survey was used to show images of familiar and unfamiliar company brands to respondents, whereafter respondents were asked to indicate whether they will invest in the shares of the identified companies. The statistical analysis entailed descriptive statistics as well as one-way analyses of variance to test the stated hypotheses. Main findings: The results of this exploratory study indicate that investors do exhibit familiarity bias when choosing between different companies to invest in. Value of the research: The inclination of individual investors to invest in familiar corporate brands can have implications for the marketing industry, financial markets, the performance of companies as well as the investment performance of individual investors in the sense that it would seem that company brands could have an influence on investment decisions.

Highlights

  • Traditional finance theory attempts to give an understanding of financial markets by applying models that are based on the assumption that individual investors are rational and, hold well-diversified portfolios

  • The reason behind the argument that price equals fundamental value is based on the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)

  • The results showed that respondents’ likelihood to invest in companies with familiar corporate brands is higher than their likelihood to invest in companies with unfamiliar corporate brands

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Traditional finance theory attempts to give an understanding of financial markets by applying models that are based on the assumption that individual investors are rational and, hold well-diversified portfolios. Empirical evidence (Cutler, Poterba & Summers 1991; Jegadeesh & Titman 1993; Mun, Vasconcellos & Kish 2000) shows that various irregularities in the market (e.g. excess volatility, overreaction and underreaction to news announcements, equity premium puzzle) exist, which result in the mispricing of stocks; they show that these mispricings are not immediately corrected by rational traders as predicted by the EMH This evidence indicates that the traditional finance models cannot fully explain the functioning of financial markets (Barberis & Thaler 2002; Kourtidis, Sevic & Chatzoglou 2011)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call