The Fallacy in the Paradox of Achilles and the Tortoise

Abstract

Zeno’s ancient paradox depicts a race between swift Achilles and a slow tortoise with a head start. Zeno argued that Achilles could never overtake the tortoise, as at each step Achilles arrived at the tortoise’s former position, the tortoise had already moved ahead. Though Zeno’s premise is valid, his conclusion that Achilles can “never” pass the tortoise relies on equating infinite steps with an infinite amount of time. By modeling the sequence of events in terms of a converging geometric series, this paper shows that such an infinite number of events sum up to a finite distance traversed in finite time. The paradox stems from confusion between an infinite number of events, which can happen in a finite time interval, and an infinite amount of time. The fallacy is clarified by recognizing that the infinite number of events can be crammed into a finite time interval. At a given speed difference after a finite amount of time, Achilles will have completed the infinite series of gaps and passed the tortoise.