Abstract

Wikipedia is a multilingual collaborative, user-generated encyclopaedia. As the largest source of free knowledge on the Internet, Wikipedia is at the crossroads of diverse cultural and national groups largely characterised by distinctive ideologies. Such ideologies often converge and have for the most part contributed to the encyclopaedia’s unprecedented success. Nonetheless, as several studies on Wikipedia have highlighted, the ideological stance of the authors is known to pose challenges to neutrality, often leading to “edit wars” that ultimately cast doubts on Wikipedia’s credibility when presenting seemingly controversial subjects. Despite the copious amount of literature on neutrality in Wikipedia, little research has yet applied multimodal discourse analysis to tackle cross-lingual violations of the Neutral Point of View (NPOV). Consequently, this study draws on selected visual and textual data from the English and Spanish Wikipedia entries for the Falklands/Malvinas War to prove that the inclusion of certain images and lexemes in particular contexts can be good indicators of NPOV violations. The data set used in the research consisted of the introductory sections, table of contents and images from the two Wikipedia entries and a set of selected comments posted on their talk pages. The findings suggest that specific lexical and visual choices are ideologically motivated and go against the principles advocated by NPOV. This is further attested by the fact that some lexical choices are contested by Wikipedia editors on the talk pages, thus showing that neutrality in the user-driven encyclopaedia is a relative and local position.

Highlights

  • Launched in 2001, Wikipedia is a multilingual, collaborative, peer-reviewed online encyclopaedia run by thousands of volunteers from almost every corner of the planet

  • The study found that the inclusion of certain images, the structural organisation of the entries, and the overuse or suppression of specific lexemes in particular contexts can be good indicators of ideologically motivated violations of Neutral Point of View (NPOV)

  • The data retrieved from the two entries for the Falklands/Malvinas War show that the use of lexemes with connotations of invasion and occupation is arbitrary

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Launched in 2001, Wikipedia is a multilingual, collaborative, peer-reviewed online encyclopaedia run by thousands of volunteers from almost every corner of the planet. Wikipedia’s power and reach have led some fearful non-democratic governments around the world to restrict access to the site, either temporarily or permanently (Hobbs and Roberts, 2018; Zhang et al, 2017). Powerful as it is, Wikipedia has often been criticised on the grounds that it is unreliable and biased, in hotly contested areas such as religion and politics (Callahan and Herring, 2011; Hyman, 2011; Warncke-Wang, 2012). Some illustrative examples are Martin’s (2017) analysis of persistent bias in one English Wikipedia entry, Azer’s (2015) investigation of accuracy, quality and readability of Wikipedia entries on the respiratory system, and Warncke-Wang’s (2012) comparative study of censorship and editorial bias among different language versions of Wikipedia

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call