Abstract

Author SummaryThe molecular mechanisms that generate biodiversity remain largely elusive. We examined how two of these mechanisms, changes in gene expression and changes in gene coding sequence, have generated an incredibly diverse set of visual systems in rapidly speciating African cichlids. We found large differences in cone opsin gene expression among cichlids inhabiting the clear waters of Lake Malawi. These changes are likely to have strong influences on retinal sensitivity and appear to be driven primarily by different foraging needs. Cichlids inhabiting the turbid waters of Lake Victoria, however, only expressed a subset of their opsin genes and variation in gene expression appears to by driven primarily by the spectrum of environmental light. When we compared the sequences of these opsin genes, we found greater variation in the genes at the ultraviolet and red edges of the sensitivity range. Taken together these findings suggest that changes in gene expression and coding sequence can be complementary and work in concert to generate changes in sensory systems. Because of their correlation with ecological factors, these changes are also likely to be adaptive and to have played a role in generating the tremendous diversity of cichlids in these two lakes.

Highlights

  • A very large body of literature has been dedicated to the geography, ecology, and genetics of adaptive diversification and speciation [1,2,3,4,5]

  • We examined how two of these mechanisms, changes in gene expression and changes in gene coding sequence, have generated an incredibly diverse set of visual systems in rapidly speciating African cichlids

  • We found large differences in cone opsin gene expression among cichlids inhabiting the clear waters of Lake Malawi

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A very large body of literature has been dedicated to the geography, ecology, and genetics of adaptive diversification and speciation [1,2,3,4,5]. The relative contributions of these mechanisms have been debated since King and Wilson proposed that functional species differences are largely the result of differential gene expression [6]. Sweeping claims regarding the importance of each mechanism have been made by proponents on both sides of the debate [14,15], whereas others have argued that this dichotomy is arbitrary [16,17]. In spite of this debate, few studies have examined the relative role that both mechanisms can play in shaping a single phenotype

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.