Abstract

This paper discusses shareholder value and regulation on board independence. Shareholder value increases with a firm’s and, more importantly, other firms’ board independence. Shareholders set inefficiently low board independence because they fail to internalize the positive externality of higher board independence on other firms or they use low board independence to compete for CEO talent. This suggests that shareholder activism cannot substitute regulation. However, mandating minimum board independence can only remove the inefficiency caused by talent competition but not externality.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call