Abstract

BackgroundThis study aimed to externally validate and upgrade the recent difficulty scoring system (DSS) proposed by Halls et al. to predict intraoperative complications (IOC) during laparoscopic liver resection (LLR).MethodsThe DSS was validated in a cohort of 128 consecutive patients undergoing pure LLRs between 2008 and 2019 at a single tertiary referral center. The validated DSS includes four difficulty levels based on five risk factors (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, previous open liver resection, lesion type, lesion size and classification of resection). As established by the validated DSS, IOC was defined as excessive blood loss (> 775 mL), conversion to an open approach and unintentional damage to surrounding structures. Additionally, intra- and postoperative outcomes were compared according to the difficulty levels with usual statistic methods. The same five risk factors were used for validation done by linear and advanced nonlinear (artificial neural network) models. The study was supported by mathematical computations to obtain a mean risk curve predicting the probability of IOC for every difficulty score.ResultsThe difficulty level of LLR was rated as low, moderate, high and extremely high in 36 (28.1%), 63 (49.2%), 27 (21.1%) and 2 (1.6%) patients, respectively. IOC was present in 23 (17.9%) patients. Blood loss of >775 mL occurred in 8 (6.2%) patients. Conversion to open approach was required in 18 (14.0%) patients. No patients suffered from unintentional damage to surrounding structures. Rates of IOC (0, 9.5, 55.5 and 100%) increased gradually with statistically significant value among difficulty levels (P < 0.001). The relations between the difficulty level, need for transfusion, operative time, hepatic pedicle clamping, and major postoperative morbidity were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Linear and nonlinear validation models showed a strong correlation (correlation coefficients 0.914 and 0.948, respectively) with the validated DSS. The Weibull cumulative distribution function was used for predicting the mean risk probability curve of IOC.ConclusionThis external validation proved this DSS based on patient’s, tumor and surgical factors enables us to estimate the risk of intra- and postoperative complications. A surgeon should be aware of an increased risk of complications before starting with more complex procedures.

Highlights

  • This study aimed to externally validate and upgrade the recent difficulty scoring system (DSS) proposed by Halls et al to predict intraoperative complications (IOC) during laparoscopic liver resection (LLR)

  • The rates of IOC (0, 9.5, 55.5 and 100%) increased gradually with statistically significant values among difficulty levels (P < 0.001)

  • Four out five parameters used in the scoring by Halls et al [26] were associated with IOC, but one could not be adequately analyzed – only two patients had previous open liver resection

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study aimed to externally validate and upgrade the recent difficulty scoring system (DSS) proposed by Halls et al to predict intraoperative complications (IOC) during laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). The use of minimally invasive liver surgery has been supported by consensus conferences in 2008 and 2014 [4, 5]. Population-based studies show LLR is still limited to a few specialists in tertiary liver centers [9]. The European Guidelines Meeting for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery in 2017 highlighted the need for a stepwise progression through the learning curve to minimize morbidity [12]. Preoperative assessment of the difficulty of LLR is important in selecting appropriate patients according to a surgeon’s skills and experience at each stage of the learning curve [12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call