The expression of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C and KAI1 in ovarian carcinoma and their clinical significance.

Abstract

Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C (UBE2C) is considered to play an important role in the tumorigenesis of many cancers and promote cell cycle progression. Kangai 1 (KAI1) is considered as a suppressor gene of tumor metastasis. However, the clinicopathological significance and their each relationship of UBE2C and KAI1 in epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) are not widely reported. The purpose of this study is to detect the expression of UBE2C and KAI1 in EOC and their clinical significance.The expression of UBE2C and KAI1 in 180 cases of EOC tissues, 60 cases of normal ovarian epithelial tissues, and 60 cases of ovarian benign tumor tissues were detected by immunohistochemistry. Patients data were also collected.Positive expression of UBE2C in EOC (38.9%) was significantly higher than that both in the normal group (0%) and benign tumors group (10.0%). Furthermore, the expression of UBE2C was positively associated with grades of differentiation, implants, lymph node metastasis (LNM), as well as the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages. Positive expression of KAI1 in EOC (25.0%) was significantly lower than that both in the normal group (100%) and benign tumors group (75.0%). And the expression of KAI1 was inversely associated with grades of differentiation, implants, LNM, and FIGO stages. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses demonstrated that UBE2C positive expression for patients with EOC had unfavorably overall survival (OS) time when compared with negative UBE2C for patients. And KAI1 positive expression for patients had favorably OS time when compared with negative KAI1 for patients. Multivariate analysis showed that positive expression of UBE2C and KAI1, implants, and FIGO stages were considered as independently prognostic factors for OS in patients with EOC. Moreover, UBE2C expression was significantly higher in high grade serous adenocarcinoma (SA) when compared with low grade SA; and KAI1 expression was significantly lower in high grade SA when compared with low grade SA. High grade SA patients had higher rates of implants, LNM, and high FIGO stages when compared with low grade SA. High grade SA patients had unfavorably OS time when compared with low grade SA.UBE2C and KAI1 should be considered as potential biomarkers of EOC prognosis.