Abstract

In the last decades, the consolidation of 3D CFD approaches in the industrial design practices has progressively moved throughflow codes from the top of design systems to somewhere in between first development stages and the final aerodynamic optimizations. Despite this trend and the typical limitations of traditional throughflow methods, designers tend to still consider such methods as fundamental tools for drafting a credible aero-design in a short turnaround time. Recently a considerable attention has been devoted to CFDbased throughflow codes as suitable means to widen the range of applicability of these tools while smoothing the predictive gap with successive threedimensional flow analyses.The present paper retraces the development and some applications of a modern and complete CFD-based throughflow solver specifically tuned for multistage axial turbine design. The code solves the axisymmetric Euler equations with an original treatment of tangential blockage and body force. It inherits its numerical scheme from a state-of-the-art CFD solver (TRAF code) and incorporates real gas capabilities, three-dimensional flow features (e.g. secondary flows, tip leakage effects), coolant flow injections, and radial mixing models. Also geometric features of actual blades, like fillets, part-span shrouds, and snubbers, are accounted for by suitable models.The capabilities of the code are demonstrated by discussing a significant range of test cases and industrial applications. They include single stage configurations and entire multistage modules of steam turbines, with flow conditions ranging from subsonic to supersonic. Computational strategies for design and off-design analyses will be presented and discussed. The reliability and accuracy of the method is assessed by comparing throughflow results with 3D CFD calculations and experimental data. A good agreement in terms of overall performance and spanwise distributions is achieved in both design and off-design operating conditions.

Highlights

  • Throughflow methods have been on the scene of turbomachinery design and analysis since several decades

  • The consolidation of 3D Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) approaches in the industrial design practices has progressively moved throughflow codes from the top of design systems to somewhere in between first development stages and the final aerodynamic optimizations

  • The reliability and accuracy of the method is assessed by comparing throughflow results with 3D CFD calculations and experimental data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Throughflow methods have been on the scene of turbomachinery design and analysis since several decades. There has always been a great attention in improving the capabilities of turbomachinery design methods Despite their relevant limitations, like the ones related to the difficulties and uncertainty in transonic and supersonic flow conditions, or to the lack of detailed resolution of the flow field inside bladed regions, throughflow methods maintained the role of workhorse tool in industrial design systems. A considerable attention has been devoted to the so-called CFD-based throughflow codes as suitable means to widen the range of applicability of these tools while smoothing the predictive gap with successive three-dimensional flow analyses In preliminary stages, they are able to provide the designer with realistic performance and spanwise distributions of flow parameters. A good agreement in terms of overall performance and spanwise distributions is achieved in both design and off-design operating conditions

Computational Framework
Three dimensional flow features
Applications
KTH 4b Stage
CT3 Stage
Low-Pressure Steam Turbine
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call