The experience of patients living with a vascular access device.

Abstract

British Journal of NursingVol. 26, No. 19 NIVAS Conference ReportsThe experience of patients living with a vascular access deviceLinda J KellyLinda J KellySearch for more papers by this authorLinda J KellyPublished Online:25 Oct 2017https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.19.S36AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article References Johansson E, Björkholm M, Björvell H et al.. Totally implantable subcutaneous port system versus central venous catheter placed before induction chemotherapy in patients with acute leukaemia—a randomized study. Support Care Cancer. 2004; 12(2):99–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-003-0558-1 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarRitchie M, Kelly LJ, Moss J, Paul J, Shaw R. Exploring attitudes towards a randomised controlled trial of venous access devices—a nested pre-trial qualitative study. J Vasc Access. 2015; 16(5):407–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000447 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarSmith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. London: Sage Publishing; 2009 Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byA prospective audit evaluating use of urokinase in oncology patients with occluded central venous access devicesKaren Harrold, Annette Martin, Neel Bhuva24 October 2019 | British Journal of Nursing, Vol. 28, No. 19Health professionals' lack of knowledge of central venous access devices: the impact on patientsLinda J Kelly, Austyn Snowden, Ruth Paterson, Karen Campbell26 July 2019 | British Journal of Nursing, Vol. 28, No. 14 26 October 2017Volume 26Issue 19ISSN (print): 0966-0461ISSN (online): 2052-2819 Metrics History Published online 25 October 2017 Published in print 26 October 2017 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedPDF download