Abstract

The uneasy postmillennial consensus, which evangelicals on both sides of the Atlantic had struggled to develop throughout the long eighteenth century, could not be sustained, and Charles Wesley’s was not the only motion of dissent.1 In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, a series of revolutions shook the ancien regime and, with it, the eschato-logical assumptions that had been based on expectations of its continuing social beneficence. The American war of independence (1775–83) and a succession of European revolutions and rebellions, beginning in France (1789–99) and progressing to Ireland (1798), Serbia (1804–17) and beyond, advanced upon a secular but often quietly postmillennial confidence in the inevitable ascent of religious and political liberty, which was sometimes believed to be divinely provided and which was at other times articulated in the vocabulary of Enlightenment scepticism or Romantic nationalism.2 These events scuttled the assumption that, as one of the period’s most celebrated conservatives put it, ‘whatever is, is right.’3 In the Atlantic world, these revolutions could be both driven by and simultaneously undermining of the certainties of millennial belief, and the evidence of social fragmentation that they provided, which evangelicals continued to trace into the middle decades of the nineteenth century, drove many believers towards a systemic rethinking of eschatological hope.4

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.