The Expanding Role of Posterior Vault Distraction Osteogenesis in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension and Slit Ventricle Syndrome.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative safety and efficacy of posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) in patients with primary nonsynostotic cephalo-cranial disproportion, namely slit ventricle syndrome and idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), to a cohort of patients with craniosynostosis (CS). A retrospective review of patients undergoing PVDO from 2009 to 2019 at our institution was performed. Craniosynostosis patients were matched by sex and age at PVDO to the nonsynostotic cohort. Operative details, perioperative outcomes, and distraction patterns were analyzed with appropriate statistics. Nine patients met inclusion criteria for the non-CS cohort. Six patients (67%) underwent PVDO for slit ventricle and the remaining 3 patients (33%) underwent PVDO for IIH. The majority of CS patients were syndromic (n = 6, 67%) and had multisuture synostosis (n = 7, 78%). The non-CS cohort underwent PVDO at a median 56.1 months old [Q1 41.1, Q3 86.6] versus the CS cohort at 55.7 months [Q1 39.6, Q3 76.0] (P = 0.931). Total hospital length of stay was longer in the non-CS patients (median days 5 [Q1 4, Q3 6] versus 3 [Q1 3, Q3 4], P = 0.021). Non-CS patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts had significantly less shunt operations for ICP concerns post-PVDO (median rate: 1.74/year [Q1 1.30, Q3 3.00] versus median: 0.18/year [Q1 0.0, Q3 0.7]; P = 0.046). In this pilot study using PVDO to treat slit ventricle syndrome and IIH, safety appears similar to PVDO in the synostotic setting. The cohort lacks adequate follow-up to assess long term efficacy, although short-midterm follow-up demonstrates promising results with less need for shunt revision and symptomatic relief. Future studies are warranted to identify the preferred surgical approach in these complex patients.