Abstract

The law on human rights court has brought the new hopes for certain people have suffered because of the human rights violation happened in the past government (before the law enacted in the years of 2000). The demand of justice has been made by victims, the families of victims and other sympathetic parties by bringing those who have violated human rights in the past. The demand for justice does not only focus on human rights violations, which occurred in the past but also similar human rights violations that will occur in the future. The existence of a permanent Human Rights Court seems to imply that human rights will be upheld and protected. The resolution of past human rights violations via a conflict approach is preferable for the national reconciliation. The resolution of past human rights violations through extra-judicial organizations is an advanced step towards resolving the case, whereas a conflict approach can be used to settle the case. The existence of the Human Rights Law provides a new frontier in implementing the principle of restorative justice in the approach of case settlement. It is hoped that such restorative justice can create a political balance between the past and the future.

Highlights

  • Human Rights are a contentious topic that will continue to be an ongoing subject of discussion

  • The law on human rights court has brought the new hopes for certain people have suffered because of the human rights violation happened in the past government

  • The demand for justice does focus on human rights violations, which occurred in the past and similar human rights violations that will occur in the future

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human Rights are a contentious topic that will continue to be an ongoing subject of discussion. The Government issued a Government Regulation in lieu to the (PERPU) Number 1/1999 regarding the Human Rights Court This step was taken as an effort to prevent the Security Council of the United Nations from proposing a resolution to establish an ad hoc Tribunal similar to those that had been established in Rwanda and Yugoslavia. The faith of the international community in the efforts of the Indonesian government to uphold the supremacy of law against human rights violations has improved, through the delivery of the results of the investigation of the case of East Timor by Komnas HAM to the Attorney General Such faith was further strengthened after the government submitted the draft law regarding the Human Rights Court to amend PERPU 1/1999. This Essay would gives an overview of the existence of human rights court in Indonesia and discuss some certain issue in related with the court, there are the establishment of the Human Rights Court based on the law 26/2000 regarding Human Rights Court, the court jurisdiction, the enactment of the retroactivity principle in such Law, Witness protection in the court and certain issue in related with the extra judicial mechanism

The Establishment of The Human Rights Court
Jurisdiction of The Court
Reviewed on Witness Protection in The Human Rights Court
Extra Judicial Mechanism
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call