Abstract
The issuance of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 on January 6, 2020, caused a change in the execution pattern of Fiduciary Guarantee objects. The issuance of this Constitutional Court decision was not accompanied by creating a new norm regarding the execution pattern of Fiduciary Guarantee objects. It brings legal uncertainty and ambiguity in executing Fiduciary Guarantee objects. Therefore, the statements of the problem in this paper are how is the pattern of execution after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019? And how is the existence of new norms after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019? The research method used is the normative legal research method. The pattern of execution of Fiduciary Guarantee objects after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 experienced ambiguity and obscurity because the contents of the Constitutional Court’s decision were only general norms. The existence of new norms after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 is necessary to support legal certainty in executing objects of Fiduciary Guarantee.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
