Abstract
Since its inception the Exclusionary Rule has been controversial. Originally founded on judicial integrity, it is now almost exclusively viewed as having validity only if it is a deterrent. Neither rationale has been satisfactorily established through empirical research. Based on recent precedents, it is extrapolated that the recently established "good faith" exception to the Exclusionary Rule will grow. Three possible versions of the Exclusionary Rule for the year 2000 are presented: (1) "good faith" will apply to all police conduct; (2) only intentional conduct or deliberate indifference will result in suppression; (3) or due process will re-emerge as the constitutional basis for suppression.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
