Abstract
ABSTRACT This contribution focuses on expanding understanding of anti-psychoanalytic attitudes in psychology. Psychoanalysis and related approaches have been openly vilified and discounted within academic and organized American psychology. Socio-historical antecedents of this antagonism provide a framework for understanding how the marginalization of psychoanalysis has been maintained despite the significant empirical, historical, and socio-cultural evidence supporting it. I argue that such marginalization has contributed to professional monoculture, failure to provide consumers with access to effective forms of treatment, and disconnection from critical multicultural frameworks grounded in psychoanalytic tenets. Patterns of psychoanalysis’ exclusion highlight the field’s difficulties in addressing historically situated ideological biases and disputes over resources.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.