Abstract

Based on information from the Ministry of Justice of the Kyrgyz Republic, as well as data from scientists in a number of countries, the author concludes that it is unconstitutional and unreasonable to introduce into the criminal process of the Kyrgyz Republic such a subject as an investigating judge, who competes in his powers with the head of the investigative unit and the supervising prosecutor at the investigation stage , which creates a split in the criminal prosecution system, slows down its work, interferes with it, destabilizes it, has actually become a criminal prosecution body according to the plan of Western “experts”, whose task is to destroy the more or less efficient system of criminal prosecution and fight against crime in the Kyrgyz Republic.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.