Abstract

SYNOPSISAttention is drawn to the inadequacy of the standard methods of qualitative assessment of surfaces, particularly for translucent specimens in the magnification range intermediate between the light and electron microscopes. The advantages of certain unconventional methods, namely metal shadowing for light microscopy, reflection electron microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call