Abstract

The Lightning Network (LN) was released on Bitcoin’s mainnet in January 2018 as a solution to favor scalability. This work analyses the evolution of the LN during its first year of existence in order to assess its impact over some of the core fundamentals of Bitcoin, such as: node centralization, resilience against attacks and disruptions, anonymity of users, autonomous coordination of its members. Using a network theory approach, we find that the LN represents a centralized configuration with few highly active nodes playing as hubs in that system. We show that the removal of these central nodes is likely to generate a remarkable drop in the LN’s efficiency, while the network appears robust to random disruptions. In addition, we observe that improvements in efficiency during the sample period are primarily due to the increase in the capacity installed on the channels, while nodes’ synchronization does not emerge as a distinctive feature of the LN. Finally, the analysis of the structure of the network suggests a good preservation of nodes’ identity against attackers with prior knowledge about topological characteristics of their targets, but also that LN is probably weak against attackers that are within the system.

Highlights

  • Since its inception, Bitcoin has been known as a technology unable to perform a great amount of transactions per unit of time [1]

  • The way nodes tend to create channels is of utmost importance for the goals of the Lightning Network (LN) to serve as a facilitating environment to favour scalability and adoption

  • We assess the efficiency of the LN, i.e., its capacity to disseminate information through its nodes, which is a critical aspect for routing transactions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bitcoin has been known as a technology unable to perform a great amount of transactions per unit of time [1] Being coded in such a way that on average a single block is mined and added to the blockchain every ten minutes, Bitcoin can perform a maximum of seven transactions per second. Visa can routinely process two thousand transactions per second, with peaks of several thousand transfers [1, 2]. Miners are those players in this system that can build and add new constituencies to the blockchain, so putting them in place to impose higher fees in times of great demand.

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.