Abstract

<p><b>Even though many project management techniques and methods have been developed and established, project managers and practitioners still find themselves unprepared and overwhelmed by the complexity and changing nature of stakeholder thinking and behaviour. The literature of stakeholder management and stakeholders in projects indicates that this complexity can be explained by the dynamics, complex interactions, and individual differences of project stakeholders. Thus, stakeholder perception and their social networks are dynamic and influence each other during project implementation. Both of them are also affected by the individual characteristics of stakeholders, which are linked to their past experience and background. However, while studies have focused on stakeholder dynamics as influenced by their social networks, very few of them focus on these dynamics as influenced by both the social networks and individual characteristics of stakeholders. This research addresses this gap by considering both aspects in the analysis of stakeholder dynamics or in other words, stakeholder dynamics at individual levels. The research follows the social constructionist paradigm and uses Vickers’ concept of appreciative systems as the theoretical lens. Through this lens, the above dynamics of stakeholder perception are described as the dynamics of their appreciation of projects as influenced by their standards and perceptions of events and ideas. The Repertory Grid Technique was the main data collection and analysis method. Data were collected from 47 interviews with ten participants who were each involved with one of three university accreditation projects, two in Vietnam and one in New Zealand. Data analysis consisted of the principal component analysis of repertory grids to identify the changes in standards and appreciation, the integration of these changes with the participants’ perceptions of events and ideas through the lens of Vickers’ concept, and the identification of the common themes. </b></p> <p> The research found that stakeholders may change the interactions that they focus on and their levels of concern about these interactions during project implementation. The drivers of these dynamics are the changes in the standards and social networks of stakeholders. A framework is proposed to summarise these dynamics and drivers. Overall, the research provides further understanding of the complex dynamics of stakeholders as influenced by their individual characteristics. Based on this understanding, the research identifies empirical strategies for project managers to understand and address stakeholders at individual levels. Finally, the research suggests potential directions for future research of stakeholder dynamics in projects.</p>

Highlights

  • This review identifies that studying the dynamics of stakeholder perception of projects as influenced by their individual characteristics as well as their networks will provide a better understanding of the complexity and changing nature of stakeholder thinking and behaviour in projects

  • This review indicates that the complexity of stakeholder thinking and behaviour can be explained by the dynamics of stakeholder perception, as influenced by their networks and individual characteristics or in other words, the dynamics of stakeholder perception at individual levels

  • Pouloudi et al (2016) and Sloan and Oliver (2013) in the stakeholder literature and Aaltonen et al (2008) and Pan (2005) in the project management literature have explored the influence of stakeholder networks on the dynamics of stakeholder perception

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Projects involve a wide range of different activities in different industries (Winter et al, 2006) In manufacturing, such activities may include developing new products, innovating existing products, and improving deficient products (Gupta et al, 2019). In services such as education, these activities may include improving research or training quality. The researcher explains to the participants the interview topics, which are the participant perception of their accreditation projects. The texts are “Ideal project”, “Less than ideal project,” “The target accreditation project,” and the names of three other projects that the participants have worked on and find most relevant to their perception of the target projects.

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.