Abstract

The evolutionary theory of aging has set the foundations for a comprehensive understanding of aging. The biology of aging has listed and described the “hallmarks of aging,” i.e., cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in human aging. The present paper is the first to infer the order of appearance of the hallmarks of bilaterian and thereby human aging throughout evolution from their presence in progressively narrower clades. Its first result is that all organisms, even non-senescent, have to deal with at least one mechanism of aging – the progressive accumulation of misfolded or unstable proteins. Due to their cumulation, these mechanisms are called “layers of aging.” A difference should be made between the first four layers of unicellular aging, present in some unicellular organisms and in all multicellular opisthokonts, that stem and strike “from the inside” of individual cells and span from increasingly abnormal protein folding to deregulated nutrient sensing, and the last four layers of metacellular aging, progressively appearing in metazoans, that strike the cells of a multicellular organism “from the outside,” i.e., because of other cells, and span from transcriptional alterations to the disruption of intercellular communication. The evolution of metazoans and eumetazoans probably solved the problem of aging along with the problem of unicellular aging. However, metacellular aging originates in the mechanisms by which the effects of unicellular aging are kept under control – e.g., the exhaustion of stem cells that contribute to replace damaged somatic cells. In bilaterians, additional functions have taken a toll on generally useless potentially limited lifespan to increase the fitness of organisms at the price of a progressively less efficient containment of the damage of unicellular aging. In the end, this picture suggests that geroscience should be more efficient in targeting conditions of metacellular aging rather than unicellular aging itself.

Highlights

  • The hallmarks of aging (López-Otín et al, 2013) are mechanisms jointly involved in human aging that are likely to have evolved progressively on top of one another in a multilayered mechanism

  • A distinction is made between chronological lifespan (CLS), i.e., the time individual cells can live before they divide again, and replicative lifespan (RLS), i.e., the number of times individual cells can divide (Ackermann et al, 2007)

  • This paper has proposed a multilayered evolutionary view on aging (MEVA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The hallmarks of aging (López-Otín et al, 2013) are mechanisms jointly involved in human aging that are likely to have evolved progressively on top of one another in a multilayered mechanism. To determine how they have evolved is key to understanding how mechanisms of aging interact in humans. Surprisingly, this question has never been investigated. The Hallmarks of Aging Across the Tree of Life (Williams, 1957). These mechanisms have been properly formalized (Hamilton, 1966). Few reviews have sketched which mechanisms of aging are involved in which species (Petralia et al, 2014; Cohen, 2018), and none in an evolutionary perspective

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call