Abstract

PurposeInnovation dynamics have been the object of study of several researchers, focusing in particular on technological innovation and the emergence of a dominant design. However, these models have been challenged by how the pervasiveness of digital technologies is speeding up the pace at which innovation evolves. On the other hand, a growing body of literature in innovation management has started underlining the relevance of new product and service meanings as a source of innovation.Design/methodology/approachThis research aims to study the different innovation dynamics within an industry, investigating not only how companies react to fast-changing functional advancements but rather how their behavior changes as shifts in meaning occur. To properly assess the phenomenon, this longitudinal study analyzes the social media industry, strongly subjected to continuous functional advancements, through a deep dive in the 160 innovations introduced between 2003 and 2017 by the eight leading players in the industry.FindingsOur results illustrate the co-existence of different approaches to innovation within an industry and hint that consequent and fast cycles of innovation in both functionalities and meanings discourage the emergence of a dominant design.Practical implicationsOur results help managers and innovators acknowledge the possibility to leverage not just on the technological dimension of innovation but also the reason why people use a given product or service, innovating its meaning. Furthermore, our results recognize the co-existence of different innovation streams upon which innovators can act.Originality/valueThis research contributes to the extant literature in innovation management, extending the classical models of innovation dynamics by including the evolution of innovations of meaning in relation to technological innovation.

Highlights

  • The way innovation evolves in a market has been the object of study for several scholars

  • The seminal work proposed by Tushman and Anderson (1986) and Abernathy and Utterback (1978) has given rise to an entire literature stream that investigates the evolutionary dynamics of technological innovation and how technological discontinuities lead to a series of cycles of innovation

  • As the role of meaning in innovation is expanding from design-intensive industries to several other domains and that technology is often considered an enabler for new meanings (Verganti, 2009; Dell’Era et al, 2017; Goto, 2017; Magistretti and Dell’Era, 2019; Magistretti et al, 2020) the aim of this research is to dig into the related innovation dynamics, by not just considering the functional improvements brought by innovation and the shift in the product/service meaning – i.e., the reason why customers buy and love a given product or service (Verganti, 2009)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The way innovation evolves in a market has been the object of study for several scholars. The seminal work proposed by Tushman and Anderson (1986) and Abernathy and Utterback (1978) has given rise to an entire literature stream that investigates the evolutionary dynamics of technological innovation and how technological discontinuities lead to a series of cycles of innovation. Through an era of ferment, industries see the establishment of a “dominant design” – i.e., a design that becomes the industry standard Instagram eliminating the possibility to view the number of likes in a post

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call