The Evolution of Infidelity in Socially Monogamous Passerines Revisited: A Reply to Griffith

Abstract

Previous article No AccessThe Evolution of Infidelity in Socially Monogamous Passerines Revisited: A Reply to GriffithGöran Arnqvist, Mark Kirkpatrick, and Editor: Allen J. MooreGöran Arnqvist*Corresponding author; e‐mail: [email protected]. Search for more articles by this author , Mark Kirkpatrick†E‐mail: [email protected]. Search for more articles by this author , and Editor: Allen J. Moore Search for more articles by this author 1. Department of Ecology and Evolution, Animal Ecology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, University of Uppsala, Norbyvägen 18D, SE‐752 36 Uppsala, Sweden;2. Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 169, Number 2February 2007 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/510606 Views: 57Total views on this site Citations: 16Citations are reported from Crossref HistoryReceived September 18, 2006Accepted September 26, 2006Published online January 11, 2007 Keywordsgenetic compatibilitygood genesmate choicepaternal investmentpolyandrysexual selection© 2007 by The University of Chicago.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Vladimir G. Grinkov, Andreas Bauer, Helmut Sternberg, Michael Wink Understanding Extra-Pair Mating Behaviour: A Case Study of Socially Monogamous European Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) in Western Siberia, Diversity 14, no.44 (Apr 2022): 283.https://doi.org/10.3390/d14040283Vladimir G. Grinkov, Andreas Bauer, Helmut Sternberg, Michael Wink Heritability of the extra-pair mating behaviour of the pied flycatcher in Western Siberia, PeerJ 8 (Jul 2020): e9571.https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9571María Juliana Benítez Saldívar, Carolina Isabel Miño, Viviana Massoni Genetic mating system, population genetics and effective size of Saffron Finches breeding in southern South America, Genetica 147, no.3-43-4 (Jul 2019): 315–326.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-019-00072-4Erica P. van Rooij, Lee A. Rollins, Clare E. Holleley, Simon C. Griffith Extra-pair paternity in the long-tailed finch Poephila acuticauda, PeerJ 4 (Jan 2016): e1550.https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1550Aneta Arct, Szymon M. Drobniak, Mariusz Cichoń Genetic similarity between mates predicts extrapair paternity—a meta-analysis of bird studies, Behavioral Ecology 26, no.44 (Feb 2015): 959–968.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv004D. K. Dowling, B. R. Williams, F. Garcia-Gonzalez Maternal sexual interactions affect offspring survival and ageing, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27, no.11 (Nov 2013): 88–97.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12276B. Matysioková, V. Remeš Faithful females receive more help: the extent of male parental care during incubation in relation to extra-pair paternity in songbirds, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26, no.11 (Nov 2012): 155–162.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12039Jin-Won Lee Females may not obtain indirect genetic benefits from extra-pair paternity in vinous-throated parrotbills, Paradoxornis webbianus, Journal of Ethology 30, no.11 (Jul 2011): 53–59.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-011-0292-yJane M. Reid, Peter Arcese, Rebecca J. Sardell, Lukas F. Keller Heritability of female extra-pair paternity rate in song sparrows ( Melospiza melodia ), Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278, no.17081708 (Oct 2010): 1114–1120.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1704Emmi Schlicht, Bart Kempenaers Extra-Pair Paternity and Sexual Selection, (Jan 2011): 35–65.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53892-9_2L. A. WHITTINGHAM, P. O. DUNN Fitness benefits of polyandry for experienced females, Molecular Ecology 19, no.1111 (Apr 2010): 2328–2335.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04640.xAndrea K. Townsend, Anne B. Clark, and Kevin J. McGowan Direct Benefits and Genetic Costs of Extrapair Paternity for Female American Crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos). A. K. Townsend et al., The American Naturalist 175, no.11 (Jul 2015): E1–E9.https://doi.org/10.1086/648553Oren Hasson, Lewi Stone Male infertility, female fertility and extrapair copulations, Biological Reviews 84, no.22 (May 2009): 225–244.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00068.xSigrunn Eliassen, Hanna Kokko Current analyses do not resolve whether extra-pair paternity is male or female driven, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62, no.1111 (Jun 2008): 1795–1804.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0608-2TOBIAS ULLER, MATS OLSSON Multiple paternity in reptiles: patterns and processes, Molecular Ecology 17, no.1111 (Apr 2008): 2566–2580.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03772.xDustin R Rubenstein Female extrapair mate choice in a cooperative breeder: trading sex for help and increasing offspring heterozygosity, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274, no.16201620 (May 2007): 1895–1903.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0424