Abstract

Every human has a fundamental right, to determine what happens to their body (autonomy). For us as surgeons, it is imperative that we obtain valid consent from our patients before performing any examination or procedure. For consent to be valid, it must be informed, voluntary, and be given by a competent patient. There is an existing judicial debate in UK Law regarding how much information should be given to patients for the consent to be accepted as informed and therefore valid. Recently, the case of Montgomery vs NHS Lanarkshire has changed the consent law in the UK.

Highlights

  • Background/Introduction Every human has a fundamental right, to determine what happens to their body

  • Aims/Objectives We aim to describe the evolution of consent law in the UK

  • Landmark cases on informed consent in British Law have been provided in the table attached

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Background/Introduction Every human has a fundamental right, to determine what happens to their body (autonomy). The Evolution of Consent Law in the UK It is imperative that we obtain valid consent from our patients before performing any examination or procedure. For consent to be valid, it must be informed, voluntary, and be given by a competent patient.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call