Abstract

The Bajocian to Oxfordian sequence ofGryphaeain Great Britain displays phyletic trends very similar to those exhibited by the famous and independent lineage of LiassicGryphaea. In both lineages, shells become larger, relatively less coiled with reduced shell height, and more weakly sulcate. Larger, more saucer-shaped descendants are more stable than their ancestors; the sulcus, which enhanced stability in more strongly coiled forms, was no longer needed. CretaceousGryphaeamay provide a third independent example of similar phyletic trends. We divide the Middle and Upper Jurassic sequence into four successive subspecies:G. bilobata bilobata (= G. sublobata)of the Lower Bajocian,G. bilobata calloviense subsp.nov. from the Lower Callovian,G. dilatata lituolafrom higher zones of the Callovian andG. dilatata dilatatafrom the Oxfordian. We took nine measures of basic size, coiling, attachment area and sulcus for these taxa and for four North American species living during the same time. In thebilobata-dilatatalineage, we separate evolutionary from ontogenetic trends on orthogonal axes of a varimax factor analysis. Phyletic trends towards increasing size and towards reduced height with weaker sulci can be distinguished. Centroids for the four subspecies project in temporal order upon the first axis of a discriminant analysis (76% of all information). When American species are added, all taxa separate reasonably well but we find no consistent contrast between the continents. Bivariate results distinguish the growth patterns leading to similar adult morphologies in thebilobata-dilatataas opposed to the Liassic lineage. LiassicGryphaeaexhibit strong ontogenetic allometry for increased coiling; evolution towards decreased coiling occurred by paedomorphosis affecting all stages of growth. Thebilobata-dilatatalineage displays no ontogenetic allometry in post-juvenile growth; phyletic reduction in coiling can be traced to changes in early ontogeny alone. We summarize the stratigraphy and geographic distribution of JurassicGryphaeathroughout the world.Gryphaeadid not arise repeatedly by iterative evolution from a normal oyster stock. It first appears in the Upper Triassic, beforeLiostrea; LiassicGryphaeacan be derived from their Triassic congeners. We do not believe that Middle and Upper JurassicGryphaeaarose from the ostreidCatinula. Moreover, the ecology of ostreids and gryphaeids seems to be consistently different throughout their history: ostreids tend to be opportunistic species inhabiting unpredictable environments within physically controlled communities of low diversity; gryphaeids are included in the ecosystems of predictable environments characterized by biologically accommodated communities of high diversity.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call