Abstract

While inbreeding avoidance is widely accepted as the major driver of female natal dispersal, the evolution of male philopatry is still poorly understood and discussed to be driven by male mating strategy, mate competition among male kin and kin cooperation. During a twelve-year study, we gathered detailed genetic and observational data of individually marked proboscis bats to assess the degree of male philopatry as well as its costs and benefits to improve the understanding of its evolution. Our results reveal several patrilines with simultaneous presence of closely related males and a small proportion of unrelated immigrant males in their colonies. Philopatric males benefit from avoiding the costs of immigration into foreign colonies through significantly longer tenure, better integration (i.e. frequent nocturnal presence in the colonies) and consequently significantly higher reproductive success compared to immigrant males. Finally, we illustrate that despite a high proportion of philopatric males in the groups, the number of closely related competing males is low. Thus, the hypothesised costs of mate competition among male kin seem to be low in promiscuous mammalian societies with unrelated females and a small degree of male immigration and are readily outweighed by the benefits of staying in the natal group.

Highlights

  • The decision to leave or stay and reproduce in the natal group has fundamental effects on an individual’s life as well as the genetic and social structure of societies and the demography of species[1]

  • Empirical examples suggest that philopatric males may benefit from cooperating with their relatives, kin cooperation is discussed as an important driver in the evolution of male philopatry (e.g.11,12)

  • The few examples of mammalian social groups consisting of philopatric and immigrant males – as e.g. suggested for the Neotropical proboscis bat41 – are a rare opportunity to discover proximate effects that could lead to potential differences in fitness and test hypotheses on the evolution of male philopatry

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The decision to leave or stay and reproduce in the natal group has fundamental effects on an individual’s life as well as the genetic and social structure of societies and the demography of species[1]. There are examples of mammalian groups with multiple reproducing male kin (e.g., lions Panthera leo[36], bottlenose dolphins Tursiops sp.[37], greater sac-winged bat Saccopteryx bilineata[38]) This raises the question which benefits allow multiple related males to reproduce in the same social group, and how severe the potential costs of local mate competition are that might need to be overcome. The few examples of mammalian social groups consisting of philopatric and immigrant males – as e.g. suggested for the Neotropical proboscis bat41 – are a rare opportunity to discover proximate effects that could lead to potential differences in fitness and test hypotheses on the evolution of male philopatry. Details on the relatedness of these competing males are currently lacking, the potential for LMC in R. naso remains unknown

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call