Abstract
This study focuses on improving the Weber model to obtain a more optimised solution, by which we can measure effectively the quality of the voting rules. By introducing the voter’s supporting domain and the candidate’s supported degree to depict the emotional factors of voters and the real voting network, we propose the concept of validity for a candidate. Upon the traditional Weber model, two improved models are presented and the corresponding global optimal candidate is used as the evaluation benchmark for the voting rules. The experiments show that the optimal solution of the two models has better robustness in complex voting networks, can be used as a standard to evaluate the voting rules. When the support degree of voter is the main factor, the Condorcet rule is optimal in most cases, and when the validity of the candidate is taken as the main factor, the Approval rule must be the best.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
