The evaluation of the equilibrium partitioning method using sensitivity distributions of species in water and soil

Abstract

The equilibrium partitioning method (EqP-method) can be used to calculate soil quality standards (expressed in mg/kg) from aquatic quality standards (expressed in μg/l) using a partitioning coefficient. The validity of this application of the EqP-method was studied comparing aquatic with terrestrial toxicity data. The data set collected for deriving environmental quality standards in the Netherlands, was used for this study. For 10 organic substances (chlorpyrifos, atrazine, carbofuran, pentachlorophenol, chlordane, aldrin, trichlorobenzene, heptachlor, trichlorophenol and trichloroethene) and for 8 metals, sufficient data were available. The aquatic toxicity data were multiplied by the partitioning coefficient in order to obtain aquatic data expressed in mg/kg. For some compounds the terrestrial toxicity data were significantly higher than the aquatic data but for other compounds it was the other way around. These differences indicate that the EqP-method can give significant over-or underestimations, due to inaccurate partitioning coefficients or differences in species sensitivities. These over- or underestimations can have an impact on the setting of environmental quality standards which are based on the hazardous concentration 5% (HC5) values. The uncertainty in the calculation of HC5 values attributed to the use of the EqP-method, was quantified. The HC5 values derived using the EqP-method were in 5% of the cases more than 20 times higher than the corresponding HC5 values that were derived directly from soil toxicity tests. Despite of this uncertainty the use of the EqP-method can still be advocated for setting soil quality guidelines when only a very limited number of terrestrial toxicity data are available.