Abstract
Icons have been widely utilized to describe and promote COVID-19 prevention measures. The purpose of this study was to analyze the preference and subjective design features of 133 existing icons associated with COVID-19 prevention measures published by the health and medical organizations of different countries. The 133 icons represent nineteen different function names, such as “Wash Hands” and “Wear Face Mask”. A total of 57 participants were recruited to perform two different tests: ranking test and subjective rating test. The ranking test was conducted to elicit the preference ranking of seven icon designs representing each function name. It was followed by a subjective rating test using 13 semantic scales on the two most preferred icons to analyze their perceived quality. Spearmen correlation was applied to derive the possible correlations between users’ rankings and the semantic scales, and Friedman’s test was also performed to determine the true difference between ranking in terms of each semantic scale to provide a fully meaningful interpretation of the data. Generally, findings from the current study showed that the image presented in the icon is the key point that affects the icons’ perceived quality. Interestingly, Spearman’s correlation analysis between preference ranking and semantic scales showed that vague–clear, weak–strong, incompatible–compatible, and ineffective–effective were the four strongest semantic scales that highly correlated with the preference ranking. Considering the significant relationships between the semantic distances and the functions, images depicted in an icon should be realistic and as close as possible to its respected function to cater to users’ preferences. In addition, the results of Spearman’s correlation and Friedman’s test also inferred that compatibility and clarity of icon elements are the main factors determining a particular icon’s preferability. This study is the first comprehensive study to evaluate the icons associated with the COVID-19 prevention measures. The findings of this study can be utilized as the basis for redesigning icons, particularly for icons related to COVID-19 prevention measures. Furthermore, the approach can also be applied and extended for evaluating other medical icons.
Highlights
Icons have been widely utilized as a tool to promote COVID-19 prevention measures during the pandemic
The purpose of this study was to analyze 133 existing icons of COVID-19 prevention measures published by the health and medical organizations of different countries
A rank ordering test was conducted for the seven icons representing each function name, followed by a subjective rating test for the top two chosen icons of the respondent form the ranking test
Summary
Icons have been widely utilized as a tool to promote COVID-19 prevention measures during the pandemic. They are intended as tools to represent complex information quickly and clearly regarding functions under COVID-19 preventive measures. Effective icon designs can overcome language barriers and can successfully convey useful information since they reduce translation requirements and give the information behind them an international look [2]. As for COVID-19 prevention icons, their success and effectivity may have a big impact with regards to virus containment. The best way to prevent illness from the COVID-19 virus is to understand how the virus spreads and to avoid being exposed to it [3]; accurately understanding and recognizing what functions under COVID-19 preventive measures the visual icons are representing is important. Factors that may influence the effectiveness of these icons should be taken into consideration, such as the icon formats [4]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
