Abstract
연구배경 : 흉수질환은 특히 복잡흉수나 농흉의 경우 치료상의 난제로 등장한다. 이들 경우의 치료의 근간은 빠른 완전한 배액과 무기폐의 재확장에 있다. 과거에는 통상 상기질환에서 흉수천자와 외과적 흉강삽관을 통해 진단 및 치료에 임하였으나 맹검적 흉강삽관시 때로는 잘못된 부위에 위치하거나 기술적으로 삽입하기 어려운 조건등으로 실패하는 경우를 경험하였다. 최근에는 영하에 도관을 정확히 삽관하고 배액하여 높은 치료성적을 보고하고 있다. 방법 : 1994년 1월부터 1996년 2월까지 흉수질환으로 관삽입을 요했던 환자 28명을 대상으로 후향적인 조사를 하였다. 맹검적 흉강삽관을 요했던 환자와 영상유도하 도관삽관을 시행받았던 환자로 구분하여 배액성공율을 비교하였다. 결과 : 전통적 방법의 흉강삽관 환자는 14명으로 원인별로 농흉 6명, 결핵성흉막염 6명, 부폐렴흉막염 2명인데 반해, 영상유도하도관삽입 역시 14명이었으나 원인별로는 농흉 2명, 결핵성흉막염 6명, 부폐렴흉막염 5명, 원인미상이 1명 있었다. 인상적 및 방사선학적으로 성공적인 배액을 보인 경우가 전자의 방법에서는 79%인데 반해 후자는 93%로서 영상유도하 도관배액에서 높은 치료성적을 보여주었으며 합병증은 한예에서 미미하게 발생하였다. 결론 : 영상유도하의 도관배액술은 복잡흉수나 국소화된 농흉환자에서 안전하며 성공율을 가진 치료법으로 적용할 수 있을 판단되니 향후 좀 더 많은 환자를 대상으로 한 비교연구가 뒷따라야 하겠다. 【Background : Pleural fluid collections may pose a difficult therapeutic problem. Complete drainage of complicated effusions or empyemas and reexpansion of atelectatic lung are important in obtaining a satisfactory clinical outcome. The usual approach to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with pleural effusion and empyema has been with needle thoracentesis and chest tube drainage. With chest tube drainage, technical difficulties and failures may occur as a result of improper tube drainage, particularly when there is a loculation or multiple and inaccesible collections. Fluoroscopic or sonographic guidance facilitates the proper tube insertion and drainage. Method : Twenty eight patients were required for tube drainage due to pleural fluid collections between January 1994 to February 1996. The author compared the results of drainage under applying each different method between blind chest tube insertion and image guided catheter insertion. Results : The conventional blind chest tube group comprised 14 patients; 6 empyema, 6 tuberculous effusion, and 2 parapneumonic effusion. The image guided catheter group of smaller french were composed of 14 patients; 2 empyema, 6 tuberculous effusion, 5 parapneumonic effusion, and 1 effusion of undetermined origin. Radiologic improvement with successful drainage was noticed in 79% with the blind chest tube group, whereas in 93% with the image guided catheter group. The complication with the latter method was unremarkable. Conclusion : Image guided catheter drainage was safe and highly successful in treating patients, not only with complicated effusion also with loculated empyema. Image guided catheter drainage offers an alternative in patients in whom closed drainage is required as the initial treatment.】
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.