Abstract
We evaluated the quality of selected rheumatology guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Guidelines were also assessed to determine if Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology had been used during development and for the inclusion of health inequity considerations. Only half of the guidelines used the GRADE methodology, and this was associated with higher AGREE II ratings in the Rigor of Development domain. Ongoing areas identified for improvement included more meaningful engagement of patients in guideline panels, increased transparency of the management of conflicts of interest, improved reporting of strategies for guideline implementation, and increased consideration of the health equity implications throughout guideline development and implementation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
