Abstract

The new Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) proposal includes few improvements compared to previous programming periods which may reinforce future evaluation, but we can also observe elements that may weaken the assessment, with the risk of repeating past failures. The objective of this essay is to analyse the new framework proposed for evaluation in the future CAP and to promote a collective discussion on how to make evaluations more usable, useful and reliable for users and practitioners. The first part of the paper analyses the main elements of evaluation during the different rural development programming cycles. A second part is dedicated to an examination of the current programming period (2014–2020) and the implications of the introduction of the Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) and the evaluation plan. In a third part, we critically discuss the proposals for the next programming period and we offer some concluding reflections and two main open questions. From the analyses carried out, many elements emerge to encourage discussion on the role that evaluation has played and can play and the critical points to face. The experiences in rural development policies have introduced important changes in theoretical and implementation terms. In particular, they helped to build evaluation capacity and enabled the involvement of the civil society. However, it is also clear that the European Commission (EC) designed path has often led to an increase in rigidity and orthodoxy towards common frameworks compliance.

Highlights

  • We can read the introduction of the National Strategic Plan (NSP) as a tool to simplify the implementation of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)

  • The paper presents a summary analysis of the evolution in rural development. This part highlights and compares the main and characterising elements of evaluation in the different programming periods especially based on the lessons learnt from the Italian Rural Development Programmes (RDPs)

  • The reference documents for this essay were selected based on their contribution to the understanding of the specificities of evaluation in the field of rural development (CAP II Pillar), both in a theoretical and in a practical way with particular attention to the operational results of evaluations, highlighting the challenges faced by evaluators since the 2000–2006 programming cycle and including the forthcoming 2021–2017 period

Read more

Summary

Introduction with regard to jurisdictional claims in

The European Rural Development (RD) policies were introduced in the second half of the 1980s, as part of the reform of European structural policies, and are dedicated to the competitiveness of farms and to a sustainable growth in rural areas [1,2,3,4]. One of the main innovations is the New Delivery Model (NDM), a new governance structure, which, in the Commission’s thinking, should steer from the current compliancebased to a performance-based approach. In this perspective, we can read the introduction of the National Strategic Plan (NSP) as a tool to simplify the implementation of the CAP. The paper presents a summary analysis of the evolution in rural development This part highlights and compares the main and characterising elements of evaluation in the different programming periods especially based on the lessons learnt from the Italian Rural Development Programmes (RDPs). We analyse opportunities and critical points that could derive from the Commission’s new proposal and we suggest some conclusions and improvements as well as two open questions

Information Sources and Materials
The Evolution in the Assessment of Rural Development
Evaluation
The Innovations Adopted for the Evaluation in 2014–2020 Programming Period
Post-2020
Multiannual
Final Remarks and Two Questions for the Future
To Be Performing or Not to Be Performing?
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call