Abstract

The EU’s energy transition has advanced rapidly over the last decade, with important implications for the policy landscape. Scholars have characterized the Emissions Trading System (ETS) and the Renewable Energy Directive as the most important policies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the electricity sector. However, since the early 2010s, non-governmental and industrial actors have debated whether renewable energy (RE) support and targets are compatible with the ETS. This article systematically assesses the policy preferences of five groups of non-governmental actors with respect to the role of the ETS versus RE policies in three policy processes. For most groups, preferences remain stable across the policy processes. In the electricity industry group, preferences vary from one policy process to another. During the ETS-reform, this group of actors argues that the ETS should be the main climate policy, whereas, in the Clean Energy Package-process, almost half of the utilities endorse continued RE support. This represents a shift in their line of reasoning and policy position: from asserting that RE policies ‘destroy’ the ETS, towards a position which recognizes the value of having both the ETS and RE policies as complementary instruments in the policy mix. The findings point to increasing support for RE policies, which is important for policy makers and scholars involved in designing and implementing the EU’s decarbonization policies.

Highlights

  • The need for deep reductions in global Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions is urgent and tremendous (IPCC, 2018)

  • For most groups of actors, policy preferences remain stable across the policy processes that were assessed in this article

  • This article systematically assesses the policy preferences of five non-governmental groups of actors within EU electricity policy across three policy processes. It finds that for four groups, preferences remain stable across policy processes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The need for deep reductions in global Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions is urgent and tremendous (IPCC, 2018). Renewable energy (RE) policies and the ETS are both policies whose ultimate objective is to reduce GHG emissions These two policies follow different logics: the former provides financial support and market advantages for specific low-carbon technologies, whereas the latter leaves it to market-mechanisms to decide where emission reductions should take place and through which technologies they should occur. Since they co-exist in the European electricity sector, it is important to study how they work in relation to each other. Scholars have pointed to the need for analyzing policy instruments in their mix and encourage researchers to take a policy-mix perspective (Flanagan, Uyarra, & Laranja, 2011; Rogge & Reichardt, 2016)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call