Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between the methodological and ethical features of the single-system (n = 1) design. Four issues are addressed, the first of which is the claim that the design is deficient in external validity and thereby lacks ethical justification in respect of experimental risk. It is argued against this that the single-system design is more generalisable than is generally supposed, and that its structure does much to minimise such risk. Second, the use of a control group in group studies is often seen to present ethical drawbacks, especially with regard to randomisation and the withholding of treatment, and the absence of a control group in single-system studies is often commended on these grounds. However, although there is no randomisation, the single-system design commonly involves some form of treatment denial, and gives rise to comparable ethical criticism. Third, although single-system designs avoid some of the difficulties of group studies in relation to informed consent, t...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.