Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an increasingly urgent global public health issue. Data from Public Health England — from the English Surveillance Programme for Antimicrobial Utilisation and Resistance (ESPAUR) — quantifies the scale of antibiotic resistance in key bacterial pathogens. The Department of Health’s 5-year strategy to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with AMR (2013–2018) focused on optimising antibiotic prescribing and improving infection prevention and control.1 In April 2015 NHS England introduced a Quality Premium (QP) focusing on reducing antibiotics. QPs are financial rewards, with a maximal value equivalent to £5 per patient, intended to reward clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) for improvements in the quality of the services that they commission and for associated improvements in health outcomes and reducing inequalities. The AMR QP provided commissioners with financial incentives to reduce antibiotic prescribing; 80% were linked to primary care quality measures (reduction in absolute number of antibiotic prescriptions by 1%, decrease in use of broad spectrum antibiotics by 10%) and 20% linked to improving availability of antibiotic prescribing data from secondary care.2 Incentives are a tool that governments use to help support behaviour change, are a recognised domain in behaviour change methodology, and can be considered a form of trade. CCGs are offered an incentive in the form of additional funds for investment if they have reduced antibiotic prescribing. However, the CCG also has to show that it manages public funds responsibly and will only receive a QP if it has managed its funds according to the ‘Managing Public Money’ guidelines and does not require financial support during the financial year (nor deviate substantially from expected surpluses/deficits).2 In 2014/2015 only 27% of the total available QP was achieved by CCGs. Although the financial incentive is directed towards CCGs, the behavioural change being targeted is at the level of …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.