Abstract

 
 
 “Putting it negatively, the myth of eternal return states that a life which disappears once and for all, which does not return, is like a shadow, without weight, dead in advance, and whether it was horrible, beautiful, or sublime, its horror, sublimity, and beauty mean nothing.”1 As Kundera, himself, puts it, the idea of living once and never returning to it suggests the utmost lightness under which one’s existence hinders rather than strengthen.
 The Unbearable Lightness of Being calls on us in the hope of a rediscovery of the experience of homecoming, not only in a geographical sense as we see in Oedipus the King, but more importantly in the psychological, spiritual, and epistemological sense of the term. The struggle between fate and freedom of choice, feeling of guilt and the resolution to its confrontation are among the mutual themes in these two literary masterpieces. Although there are a number of one to one connections between certain characters in the two literary works mentioned, the noteworthy is the individual journey they take to return home (in its metaphorical sense), which at the same time speaks of a collective journey of the homecoming of the human being.
 
 
Highlights
Tomas, the protagonist of the novel, an almost middle-aged well-known surgeon whose livelihood depends greatly on his erotic relationships with women, is proud of and comfortable with what he defines lightness of his life
The Unbearable Lightness of Being calls on us in the hope of a rediscovery of the experience of homecoming, in a geographical sense as we see in Oedipus the King, but more importantly in the psychological, spiritual, and epistemological sense of the term
There are a number of one to one connections between certain characters in the two literary works mentioned, the noteworthy is the individual journey they take to return home, which at the same time speaks of a collective journey of the homecoming of the human being
Summary
The protagonist of the novel, an almost middle-aged well-known surgeon whose livelihood depends greatly on his erotic relationships with women, is proud of and comfortable with what he defines lightness of his life. Joseph Campbell’s model of the final step of the myth is among the most recognizable: “When the heroquest has been accomplished, through penetration to the source, or through the grace of some male or female, human or animal, personification, the adventurer still must return with his life—transmuting trophy.”[3] Let us note that what Campbell is concerned with is the stage the hero goes through once the departure, initiation, return in its life-transforming sense is over He further explains: “Once the hero accomplishes his homecoming and returns home the adventure is understood to have come to a close.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
