Abstract
ABSTRACT THE most common methods for the estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) were evaluated under a hot and arid climate, by comparing the estimates obtained, with the actual ET from 20 cm tall, well watered and dense cover of alfalfa. The reference ET was measured with steel lysimeters (2 m x 2 m x 1.25 m in size), installed at the Agricultural Research Station of Agriculture College, King Saud University in Dirab (near Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). The climatic data, needed for estimation with the various methods, were taken from the meteorological unit of the Research Station, situated adjacent to the lysimeters. It was found that the summer ET is underestimated by all the methods, namely: Blaney-Criddle (modified), Jensen-Haise, Turc and Hargreaves methods. The winter ET is underestimated by Blaney-Criddle only, while a fair estimate of the winter ET is given by the Turc, Hargreaves and Jensen-Haise methods. Best estimates of ET are obtained with Jensen-Haise method from October to March. To obtain better results with these formulae, a new chart for k^-values of alfalfa was prepared for use with the Blaney-Criddle method and improved coefficients were developed for the Jensen-Haise, Turc and Hargreaves methods. Coefficients were also developed for ET estimation with evaporation from class 'A' pan, under hot and arid conditions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.