Abstract

Competing risks occur in survival analysis when an individual is at risk of more than one type of event and the occurrence of one event precludes the occurrence of any other event. A measure of interest with competing risks data is the cause-specific cumulative incidence function (CIF) which gives the absolute (or crude) risk of having the event by time t, accounting for the fact that it is impossible to have the event if a competing event is experienced first. The user written command, stcompet, calculates non-parametric estimates of the cause-specific CIF and the official Stata command, stcrreg, fits the Fine and Gray model for competing risks data. Geskus (2011) has recently shown that some of the key measures in competing risks can be estimated in standard software by restructuring the data and incorporating weights. This has a number of advantages as any tools developed for standard survival analysis can then be used for the analysis of competing risks data. This paper describes the stcrprep command that restructures the data and calculates the appropriate weights. After using stcrprep a number of standard Stata survival analysis commands can then be used for the analysis of competing risks. For example, sts graph, failure will give a plot of the cause-specific CIF and stcox will fit the Fine and Gray proportional subhazards model. Using stcrprep together with stcox is computationally much more efficient than using stcrreg. In addition, the use of stcrprep opens up new opportunities for competing risk models. This is illustrated by fitting flexible parametric survival models to the expanded data to directly model the cause-specific CIF.

Highlights

  • Competing risks occur in survival analysis when a subject is at risk of more than one type of event

  • An alternative measure is the causespecific cumulative incidence function (CIF), which gives an estimate of absolute or crude risk of death, accounting for the possibility that individuals may die of other causes (Putter, Fiocco, and Geskus 2007)

  • It is of more interest to estimate the cause-specific cumulative incidence function, Fk(t), defined as t sK

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Competing risks occur in survival analysis when a subject is at risk of more than one type of event. You can plot the cause-specific CIF using sts graph and fit a Fine and Gray (1999) model using stcox An advantage of this approach is that some of the methods developed for the Cox model can be used for models on the subdistribution hazard scale. Flexible parametric survival models use restricted cubic splines to estimate the underlying hazard and survival functions, which enables virtually any shaped hazard to be captured (Royston and Parmar 2002) These models are implemented in Stata with the stpm command, available from the Statistical Software Components (Lambert and Royston 2009; Royston and Lambert 2011).

Methods
Models for the cumulative incidence function
The stcrprep command
European Blood and Marrow Transplantation data
Using stcrreg
Using stcrprep
Plotting the cause-specific CIF using sts graph
Testing for differences in the CIF using sts test
Proportional subhazards model using stcox
Time gains for large datasets
Testing the proportional-subhazards assumption
Estimation within one model
4.10 Fitting cause-specific hazards models
Parametric models
Parametric proportional subhazards model
Nonproportional subhazards
Models on other scales
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call