Abstract

Banks are for people with money rather than for people without money. However, microfinance is banking for the unbankables. It brings credit, loan, savings and other essential financial services within the reach of millions of people who are too poor to be served by regular banks, i.e. almost 60-90% of the global population. It is one of the most intriguing features of financial economics today. In the aftermath of the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize being awarded to the Bangladeshi, Mohammed Yunus, who is a champion of the cause for microcredit, the common presumption has been that microfinance create s undeniable social benefits such as poverty alleviation and more equal social opportunities. Indeed, this is true to a large extent; however, less acknowledged are the problems that lurk behind this facade of ‘social service’. Donning the caps of economists, this pa per discusses the economic rationality of microfinance as an effective tool for achieving poverty alleviation. We ask the question on whether the theoretical objective of microfinance for ‘helping the poor’ is sullied in practice by rent seeking, profit seeking and corruption. We assess the fundamental economic model for the basis on which Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) provide loans to the poor and as whether the poor people eventually benefited from this financial innovation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.