Abstract
China will impose both renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and emissions trading (ET) on the electricity industry, but the product competition in the retail market and the influence of the supply chain network structure has not been investigated. This paper studies policy effects by comparing equilibrium results under different supply chain network structures, and we use the concept of consumer environmental awareness to capture a product’s substitutability. Results indicate that: (1) Both increases in the permit price and the rise of the quota obligation reduces the aggregate profits of the supply chain, but the former rather than the latter increases the profits of the renewable power generating company; (2) the differential pricing improves the retailer’s flexibility in the charged price when confronting increases in the permit price and the quota obligation; (3) higher consumer environmental awareness makes the supply chain less profitable and increases the costs of ET suffered by the consumer; (4) the cooperation between the thermal power generating company and the retailer significantly increases the aggregated profits of the supply chain, although the cooperative profit is sensitive to environmental awareness. Moreover, the consumer suffers the highest costs that the retailer passes on them, and may prefer to feel that the emission cost and compliance cost are less affordable. In contrast, the cooperation between power generating companies removes the influence of environmental awareness, but the aggregated profits of the supply chain are smaller than in the decentralized decision scenario.
Highlights
In China, the feed-in tariff (FIT) policy boosted the development of renewable energy generation, but it failed to encourage the state grid company to consume the soaring levels of electricity from renewable energy sources (RES-E)
This paper aims to study the interplay among prices, quota obligation, permit price, and consumer’s environmental awareness by comparing policy effects of emissions trading (ET) and renewable portfolio standards (RPS) in different supply chain network structures, and the retailer is required to comply with the quota obligation
We further investigated the trend of profits
Summary
In China, the feed-in tariff (FIT) policy boosted the development of renewable energy generation, but it failed to encourage the state grid company to consume the soaring levels of electricity from renewable energy sources (RES-E). As the government is confronted with an unprecedented subsidy deficit and the pressure of achieving its energy goal in 2020 [1,2], China is eager to adjust its current subsidy policy. Compared to the FIT, the renewable portfolio standards (RPS) combined with tradable green certificates (TGCs) are generally regarded as a quantity-driven instrument designed according to neoclassical economic theory [3,4,5,6]. To realize their energy goal while minimizing social costs, on 3 March 2018, China announced that RPS combined with TGCs would soon be Energies 2019, 12, 439; doi:10.3390/en12030439 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies. RPS and ET, which is regarded as the policy mix [9,10,11], will coexist in the Chinese electricity market in the future
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.