Abstract
Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS) results from a 10 percent sample of the total undergraduate population at Colorado State College (CSC) (over the past 6 years) were compared with the original Edwards norms. Males differed significantly from the published Edwards norms on eight of fifteen variables; the female sample differed significantly on six of fifteen variables; and the total sample revealed significant differences on nine of fifteen psychological need variables. The study demonstrated that, even though the original EPPS had an excellent researchbase, a major revision of the Edwards norms is now warranted so that the EPPS may continue to be the successful counseling and assessment tool it has been in the past.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
