The ‘Epistemic Critique’ of Epistocracy and Its Inadequacy

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article assesses the relevance of the epistemic critique of epistocracy developed by economists and philosophers. I argue that the various arguments in support of this critique fail. In particular, I contend that what I call the ‘Epistemic Costs Argument’ against epistocracy is at best inconclusive if one accepts that social scientific knowledge is only moderately controversial. It follows that the case against epistocracy should be made on more traditional moral/political grounds.