Abstract
This article examines my “top ten” environmental laws of the 1970s: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (1969), Clean Air Act (CAA) (1970), Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments (CWA) (1972), Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) (1972), Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (1972), Endangered Species Act (ESA) (1973), Magnuson Act (Fisheries) (1976), National Forest Management Act (NFMA) (1976), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) (1976), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) (1980).What were the pin-up qualities that made these laws look good on paper? What were the features sponsors bragged about or critics deplored? How were they understood and described at the time of legislative birth? What was thought to be new, different, and better? I discuss four common features that stand out for their merit: (1) best science, (2) public participation, (3) effective and aggressive judicial review, and (4) citizen enforcement. I also discuss several “design defects”.The great contributions of the 1970s environmental laws were not in the devices, schemes, arrangements and incentives of the several texts. They are found instead in the stunning compilation and expression of values that redefined the relationship of human beings on earth to their world and all life within it.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.